Decision of Human Rights Review Tribunal:


Behold - the decision of the Human Rights Review Tribunal.

Curious in many ways.  Not least the assertion that the McKenzie Friend was required to turn up and speak on behalf of the Plaintiff and provide a 'proper' medical certificate.  How ridiculous.  And what an outrageous breach of natural justice, on top of the existing miscarriage of justice.

Mr Mihaka is appealing this decision to the High Court.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MASH Trust - contempt of Court, fraud of vulnerable persons by lawyer and serial conman

   To Mash Trust : Tena koutou This the link to a decision of the Lawyers Disciplinary Tribunal involving lawyer Chris Tennet and the serial conman who runs his office, Brian Hunter . This decision refers to "the Trust" - we believe this to be reference to MASH Trust.  It refers to legal proceedings involving a vulnerable woman who was in a very vulnerable position.  We have previously contacted MASH trust about Hunter and Tennet and been assured that MASH trust has never and would never have anything to do with your organisation, but witnesses say otherwise, and confirm that clients of MASH Trust are still being referred to Tennet and Hunter for their particular brand of [UN]professional " pastoral care ".. The contents of this decision are extremely disturbing and we request a meeting with your board of administrators as soon as possible to discuss this please.  This decision appears to evidence fraud in regards to payments for Court reports, and ...
Read more

Judge Collins at Wellington High Court 20 November 2017:

Image
Former Solicitor General David Collins heard the matter of Te Ringa Mangu Mihaka v Human Rights Review Tribunal and Housing New Zealand Corporation in the High Court at Wellington today (20 November 2017). At twenty past four Judge Collins issued a Minute which can be read at this link . It says that under the High Court Rules Mr Mihaka seeks to appeal a decision of the Human Rights Review Tribunal, Housing New Zealand [Corporation] have sought security for costs in relation to the appeal, Mr Mihaka and his Maori Agent opposed the application for security for costs on the grounds that Mr Mihaka is impecunious. Judge Collins then noted the matters involving Mr Mihaka's lawyers, which are under investigation by the Law Society, the Privacy Commissioner and the New Zealand Police. Judge Collins noted that Mr Mihaka's efforts to secure the services of a lawyer had been "futile". Judge Collins mentions "a tranche of litigation" involving Mr Mihaka's dispute w...
Read more

Unconditional surrender.

Image
More than three years ago, on 31 October 2014, Housing New Zealand Corporation began trying to evict Te Ringa Mangu 'Dun' Mihaka from his home, serving him with a 90 day notice under section 51(1)(d) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986, on the basis of a false allegation from another tenant, fuelled by the prejudice and bias of NZ Police. On 2 December 2014 the Tenancy Tribunal issued an order terminating Mr Mihaka's tenancy and granting possession to Housing New Zealand Corporation from noon the following day, 3 December.  Mr Mihaka was approximately 73 years old at this time. Nearly 3 years later, on 2 November 2017, Sir David Carruthers issued a carefully worded Minute . following the hearing of an appeal of the decision of the Tenancy Tribunal.  Our response was to challenge the 'Minute' of Judge Walker which is referred to in Judge Carruthers's Minute, inter alia (among other related matters which we are challenging in the various Courts and Tribunals es...
Read more